Comments on: More Programming Notes of Pseudo-Interest… http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/ An angry Physicist ranting about Quantum Gravity, foundational Quantum Mechanics, the gross incompotency of Economists, and other fun issues! Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:06:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: John Armstrong http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-231 John Armstrong Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:37:56 +0000 http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-231 Here's the dirty little secret, uber: nobody can. You don't really "understand" QM, you just sort of "get used to it". Here’s the dirty little secret, uber: nobody can. You don’t really “understand” QM, you just sort of “get used to it”.

]]> By: uberzeldamaster http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-229 uberzeldamaster Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:06:00 +0000 http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-229 hmm... I have great hopes for this site. I'm interested in Quantum Mechanics too, I just can't get my head around it so much (I'm twelve)... can we do a simple article sometime? ^_^' hmm… I have great hopes for this site. I’m interested in Quantum Mechanics too, I just can’t get my head around it so much (I’m twelve)… can we do a simple article sometime? ^_^’

]]> By: angryphysicist http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-225 angryphysicist Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:34:06 +0000 http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-225 I'll have my eyes peeled; but I assume you are going to be using category theory on it if I find it. Out of curiosity, would that tell the programmer anything or would it just be a mathematical foundation for it? That would actually make an interesting term paper, though, ig someone: 1) rewrote *nix in a functional language, and 2) translated it into category theory. I’ll have my eyes peeled; but I assume you are going to be using category theory on it if I find it. Out of curiosity, would that tell the programmer anything or would it just be a mathematical foundation for it?

That would actually make an interesting term paper, though, ig someone: 1) rewrote *nix in a functional language, and 2) translated it into category theory.

]]> By: John Armstrong http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-224 John Armstrong Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:58:31 +0000 http://angryphysicist.wordpress.com/2007/07/04/more-programming-notes-of-pseudo-interest/#comment-224 In re UnixLite: Call me when you get to a functional version of Unix. Maybe "LISPux"? In re UnixLite: Call me when you get to a functional version of Unix. Maybe “LISPux”?

]]>